Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov;11(11):1254-64.
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntp133. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

The behavioral ecology of secondhand smoke exposure: A pathway to complete tobacco control

Melbourne F Hovell  1 , Suzanne C Hughes
Affiliations
Review

The behavioral ecology of secondhand smoke exposure: A pathway to complete tobacco control

Melbourne F Hovell et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: This article outlines a theoretical framework for research concerning secondhand smoke exposure (SHSe) prevention as a means to curtail the tobacco industry.

Methods: The Behavioral Ecological Model (BEM) assumes interlocking social contingencies of reinforcement (i.e., rewards or punishments) from the highest level of society (e.g., taxing cigarette sales) to physiological reactions to nicotine that influence smoking and SHSe. We review selected research concerning both policy and clinical efforts to restrict smoking and/or SHSe.

Results: Research to date has focused on smoking cessation with modest to weak effects. The BEM and empirical evidence suggest that cultural contingencies of reinforcement should be emphasized to protect people from SHSe, especially vulnerable children, pregnant women, the ill, the elderly, and low-income adults who have not "elected" to smoke. Doing so will protect vulnerable populations from industry-produced SHSe and may yield more and longer-lasting cessation.

Conclusions: Interventions that reduce SHSe may serve as a Trojan horse to counter the tobacco industry. Future studies should: (a) guide policies to restrict SHSe; (b) develop powerful community and clinical interventions to reduce SHSe; (c) test the degree to which policies and other contexts enhance the effects of clinical interventions (e.g., media programs disclosing the disingenuous marketing by the industry); and (d) investigate the effects of all health care providers' ability to reduce SHSe and generate an antitobacco culture, by advising all clients to avoid starting to smoke, to protect their children from SHSe, and to quit smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Behavioral ecological model. Note. From “Adolescent Health: Understanding and Preventing Risk Behaviors,” by R. J. DiClemente, J. S. Santelli, and R. A. Crosby. Copyright 2009 by the John Wiley & Sons., San Francisco, CA. Reproduced with permission.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adams EK, Young TL. Costs of smoking: A focus on maternal, childhood, and other short-run costs. Medical Care Research and Review. 1999;56:3–29. - PubMed
    1. Aligne CA, Stoddard JJ. Tobacco and children. An economic evaluation of the medical effects of parental smoking. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 1997;151:648–653. - PubMed
    1. Baer DM, Wolf MM. Some still-current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1987;20:313–327. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baer DM, Wolf MM, Risley TR. Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1968;1:91–97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bala M, Strzeszynski L, Cahill K. Mass media interventions for smoking cessation in adults. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2008 CD004704. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004704.pub2. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances