Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009:5:1-25.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153639.

Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology

Milton E Strauss  1 , Gregory T Smith
Affiliations
Review

Construct validity: advances in theory and methodology

Milton E Strauss et al. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009.

Abstract

Measures of psychological constructs are validated by testing whether they relate to measures of other constructs as specified by theory. Each test of relations between measures reflects on the validity of both the measures and the theory driving the test. Construct validation concerns the simultaneous process of measure and theory validation. In this article, we review the recent history of validation efforts in clinical psychological science that has led to this perspective, and we review the following recent advances in validation theory and methodology of importance for clinical researchers. These are: the emergence of nonjustificationist philosophy of science; an increasing appreciation for theory and the need for informative tests of construct validity; valid construct representation in experimental psychopathology; the need to avoid representing multidimensional constructs with a single score; and the emergence of effective new statistical tools for the evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Psychological Association Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychol. Bull. Supp. 1954;51:1–38. - PubMed
    1. Anastasi A. The concept of validity in the interpretation of test scores. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1950;10:67–78.
    1. Barch DM. The cognitive neuroscience of schizophrenia. In: Cannon T, Mineka S, editors. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 1. American Psychological Association; Washington DC: 2005. pp. 321–53. - PubMed
    1. Barch DM, Carter CS, MacDonald AW, Braver TS, Cohen JD. Context-processing deficits in schizophrenia: diagnostic specificity, 4-week course, and relationships to clinical symptoms. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2003;112(1):132–43. - PubMed
    1. Barrett P. What if there were no psychometrics? Constructs, complexity, and measurement. J. Pers. Assess. 2005;85:134–40. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources