Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review
- PMID: 17668311
- PMCID: PMC2739403
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9
Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review
Abstract
This article reviews what is currently known about how men and women respond to the presentation of visual sexual stimuli. While the assumption that men respond more to visual sexual stimuli is generally empirically supported, previous reports of sex differences are confounded by the variable content of the stimuli presented and measurement techniques. We propose that the cognitive processing stage of responding to sexual stimuli is the first stage in which sex differences occur. The divergence between men and women is proposed to occur at this time, reflected in differences in neural activation, and contribute to previously reported sex differences in downstream peripheral physiological responses and subjective reports of sexual arousal. Additionally, this review discusses factors that may contribute to the variability in sex differences observed in response to visual sexual stimuli. Factors include participant variables, such as hormonal state and socialized sexual attitudes, as well as variables specific to the content presented in the stimuli. Based on the literature reviewed, we conclude that content characteristics may differentially produce higher levels of sexual arousal in men and women. Specifically, men appear more influenced by the sex of the actors depicted in the stimuli while women's response may differ with the context presented. Sexual motivation, perceived gender role expectations, and sexual attitudes are possible influences. These differences are of practical importance to future research on sexual arousal that aims to use experimental stimuli comparably appealing to men and women and also for general understanding of cognitive sex differences.
Similar articles
-
Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli.Nat Neurosci. 2004 Apr;7(4):411-6. doi: 10.1038/nn1208. Epub 2004 Mar 7. Nat Neurosci. 2004. PMID: 15004563 Clinical Trial.
-
Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli.Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Apr;37(2):219-28. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x. Epub 2007 Aug 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2008. PMID: 17668312
-
Gender differences in sexual arousal and affective responses to erotica: the effects of type of film and fantasy instructions.Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Aug;42(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0076-2. Epub 2013 Mar 22. Arch Sex Behav. 2013. PMID: 23519591
-
Elucidating women's (hetero)sexual desire: definitional challenges and content expansion.J Sex Res. 2010 Mar;47(2):104-22. doi: 10.1080/00224490903402546. J Sex Res. 2010. PMID: 20358455 Review.
-
Sexual arousal in men: a review and conceptual analysis.Horm Behav. 2011 May;59(5):708-16. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Horm Behav. 2011. PMID: 21397602 Review.
Cited by
-
Appetitive conditioning with pornographic stimuli elicits stronger activation in reward regions than monetary and gaming-related stimuli.Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jun 1;45(8):e26711. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26711. Hum Brain Mapp. 2024. PMID: 38798103 Free PMC article.
-
The characteristics of sexual behavior in blind men in Ganzhou, China: A cross-sectional study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37574. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037574. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38669417 Free PMC article.
-
Additive Effects of Monetary Loss and Positive Emotion in the Human Brain.eNeuro. 2024 Apr 17;11(4):ENEURO.0374-23.2024. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0374-23.2024. Print 2024 Apr. eNeuro. 2024. PMID: 38565297 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory Cues Alter the Magnitude and Valence of Subjective Sexual Arousal and Desire Induced by an Erotic Video.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):1065-1073. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02802-4. Epub 2024 Feb 1. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38302852 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What can the eyes tell us about atypical sexual preferences as a function of sex and age? Linking eye movements with child-related chronophilias.Forensic Sci Res. 2023 Mar 23;8(1):5-15. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad009. eCollection 2023 Mar. Forensic Sci Res. 2023. PMID: 37712065 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research. 2003;40:27–35. - PubMed
-
- Alexander GM, Sherwin BB. Sex steroids, sexual behavior, and selection attention for erotic stimuli in women using oral contraceptives. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1993;18:91–102. - PubMed
-
- Aubrey JS. Sex and punishment: An examination of sexual consequences and the sexual double standard in teen programming. Sex Roles. 2004;50:505–514.
-
- Bancroft J. Psychological and physiological responses to sexual stimuli in men and women. In: Lennart L, editor. Society, stress, and disease (Vol. 3.): The productive and reproductive age- male/female roles and relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978. pp. 154–163.
-
- Basson R. A model of women’s sexual arousal. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2002;28:1–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical