A dynamic model of guilt: implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice
- PMID: 17576266
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01933.x
A dynamic model of guilt: implications for motivation and self-regulation in the context of prejudice
Abstract
Guilt is widely recognized as an important self-regulatory emotion, yet alternative theoretical accounts view guilt primarily as either a punishment cue or a prosocial motivator. Integrating these views, we propose that guilt functions dynamically to first provide a negative reinforcement cue associated with reduced approach motivation, which transforms into approach-motivated behavior when an opportunity for reparation presents itself. We tested this hypothesis in the context of racial prejudice. White subjects viewed a multiracial series of faces while cortical activity was recorded using electroencephalography. Following bogus feedback indicating anti-Black responses, subjects reported elevated guilt, which was associated with changes in frontal cortical asymmetry indicating reduced approach motivation. When subjects were presented with an opportunity to engage in prejudice-reducing behavior, guilt predicted greater interest in prejudice reduction, which in turn was associated with an approach-related shift in frontal asymmetry. The results support a dynamic model in which guilt is associated with adaptive changes in motivation and behavior.
Similar articles
-
Neural correlates of experienced moral emotion: an fMRI investigation of emotion in response to prejudice feedback.Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(2):203-18. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.878750. Epub 2014 Jan 22. Soc Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24450582
-
Confronting prejudice (literally): reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Apr;29(4):532-44. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250923. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003. PMID: 15273006 Clinical Trial.
-
Neuroticism and responsiveness to error feedback: adaptive self-regulation versus affective reactivity.J Pers. 2010 Oct;78(5):1469-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00658.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20. J Pers. 2010. PMID: 20663025
-
Prejudice control and interracial relations: the role of motivation to respond without prejudice.J Pers. 2009 Oct;77(5):1311-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00583.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22. J Pers. 2009. PMID: 19686455 Review.
-
Brain, emotion and decision making: the paradigmatic example of regret.Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 May 1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007. PMID: 17475537 Review.
Cited by
-
The Effect of Induced Regulatory Focus on Frontal Cortical Activity.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 1;14(4):292. doi: 10.3390/bs14040292. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38667087 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the link between social trait judgment and socio-emotional experience in neurotypical and autistic individuals.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56005-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38443486 Free PMC article.
-
The competition dynamics of approach and avoidance motivations following interpersonal transgression.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 3;120(40):e2302484120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302484120. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37769254 Free PMC article.
-
Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity.Manag Decis. 2023 Apr 17;61(4):1038-1061. doi: 10.1108/md-06-2021-0839. Epub 2022 Sep 5. Manag Decis. 2023. PMID: 37090785 Free PMC article.
-
When combining injunctive and descriptive norms strengthens the hypocrisy effect: A test in the field of discrimination.Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 29;13:989599. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.989599. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36524165 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
