Common patterns of sense making: a discursive reading of quantitative and interpretative data on sexual boredom
- PMID: 17535453
- DOI: 10.1348/014466607X177669
Common patterns of sense making: a discursive reading of quantitative and interpretative data on sexual boredom
Abstract
This paper explores the notion of sexual boredom through combining the use of qualitative and quantitative methods. Drawing on ideas from discursive psychology, we provide an interpretative reading of both numerical and textual data obtained via a postal questionnaire. Within the mixed-methods strategy adopted here, the questionnaire is treated as a medium that can deliver interesting material about prevalent linguistic resources, their content and pattern of use, available to romantic partners in making sense of sexual boredom. A total of 144 women and 66 men from the general population completed a set of structured questions, including a Sexual Boredom Scale (SBS; Watt & Ewing, 1996), followed by an open-ended question prompting more elaborated views on the topic. Statistical analysis found gender to explain some of the variation across SBS scores. An interpretative analysis of respondent ratings of disagreement/agreement and the actual meaning content of the scale's statements also reveals ranked and gendered regularities. Written responses to the open-ended question were subjected to a thematic analysis, revealing how specific changes to quality of sex, intensity of sexual interest and degree of romantic relatedness with a current partner are used by participants to delineate key dimensions of sexual boredom. Overall, the unfolding narratives of sexual boredom are greatly indebted to a static view of relationship satisfaction founded on wishful expectations for consistent, idealized displays of sexual excitement and interest from oneself and one's partner. The interplay between these understandings and a missing discourse of sexuo-erotic calmness is also considered.
Similar articles
-
A Cluster Analysis on Sexual Boredom Profiles in A Community Sample of Men and Women.J Sex Res. 2022 Feb;59(2):258-268. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1931798. Epub 2021 Jun 11. J Sex Res. 2022. PMID: 34114914
-
Perceptions of sexual boredom in a community sample.J Sex Marital Ther. 2021;47(3):224-237. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1854405. Epub 2020 Dec 8. J Sex Marital Ther. 2021. PMID: 33289446
-
The importance of sexual self-disclosure to sexual satisfaction and functioning in committed relationships.J Sex Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):3108-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02439.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24. J Sex Med. 2011. PMID: 21883943
-
Psychometric measures of boredom: a review of the literature.J Psychol. 2003 Nov;137(6):569-95. doi: 10.1080/00223980309600636. J Psychol. 2003. PMID: 14992349 Review.
-
Exploring partner communication and patterns of sexual networking: qualitative research to improve management of sexually transmitted diseases.Health Transit Rev. 1997;7 Suppl 3:103-7. Health Transit Rev. 1997. PMID: 10175971
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources