The non-regulation of food intake in humans: hope for reversing the epidemic of obesity
- PMID: 16263145
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.053
The non-regulation of food intake in humans: hope for reversing the epidemic of obesity
Abstract
Few doubt that human feeding behavior is part of larger biology regulatory system of energy stores, but the extent to which eating behavior is controlled by these biology systems and how much is due to responses to environmental stimuli is presently under debate. The results of a series of studies are presented which have attempted to determine the responsiveness of human feeding behavior to some of the "classic" biological variables that have conventionally been used to argue the biological basis of eating behavior. When humans are challenged with either overfeeding, underfeeding, or alterations of the caloric density of the diet, they fail to demonstrate precise caloric compensation. When challenged with changes in environmental stimuli, on the other hand, humans appear to be very sensitive to changes in portion size, the number of people with whom they eat, the amount that others eat and the variety of foods available. Other more chronic influences demonstrate that body weight appears to change when people move from one area of the world to another, when they enter the college environment, or when they either marry or break up. It is argued that because humans appear to be more responsive to the external environment than internal biological cues, it should be possible to curb or even reverse the epidemic of obesity by changing aspects of the external environment or human interactions with environmental variables rather than changing their internal environment through pharmacology.
Similar articles
-
[Assessing various aspects of the motivation to eat that can affect food intake and body weight control].Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Jul 7. Encephale. 2009. PMID: 19393389 Review. French.
-
Influence of physiological and subjective arousal on food intake in humans.Nutrition. 2006 Oct;22(10):996-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 15. Nutrition. 2006. PMID: 16979321
-
Putting behavior back into feeding behavior: a tribute to George Collier.Appetite. 2002 Apr;38(2):143-8. doi: 10.1006/appe.2001.0465. Appetite. 2002. PMID: 12027375
-
Control of food intake in the obese.Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:263S-270S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.129. Obes Res. 2001. PMID: 11707552 Review.
-
Determinants of food choice: relationships with obesity and weight control.Obes Res. 2001 Nov;9 Suppl 4:249S-255S. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.127. Obes Res. 2001. PMID: 11707550 Review.
Cited by
-
Association between ultra-processed food and snacking behavior in Brazil.Eur J Nutr. 2024 Jun;63(4):1177-1186. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03340-y. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Eur J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38360983
-
The Economics of a "portion size reduction" policy.PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279165. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36520871 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Dextrose or Protein Ingestion on Circulating Growth Differentiation Factor 15 and Appetite in Older Compared to Younger Women.Nutrients. 2022 Sep 30;14(19):4066. doi: 10.3390/nu14194066. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 36235718 Free PMC article.
-
The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks.Physiol Rev. 2022 Apr 1;102(2):689-813. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00028.2020. Epub 2021 Sep 6. Physiol Rev. 2022. PMID: 34486393 Free PMC article.
-
Gut-brain communication and obesity: understanding functions of the vagus nerve.J Clin Invest. 2021 May 17;131(10):e143770. doi: 10.1172/JCI143770. J Clin Invest. 2021. PMID: 33998597 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical