Clinical efficacy of devices for nonablative photorejuvenation
- PMID: 12437458
- DOI: 10.1001/archderm.138.11.1503
Clinical efficacy of devices for nonablative photorejuvenation
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the scientific evidence for the efficacy of devices for nonablative photorejuvenation of the skin.
Data sources: All studies published between January 1996 and June 2002 in the dermatology literature listed in the MEDLINE database. Search terms included nonablative and photoaging or skin aging.
Study selection: All studies that presented data on human clinical trials that were designed to test the efficacy of nonablative light sources in reducing fine lines and wrinkles due to photodamage.
Data extraction: Data presented in the studies were reviewed and evaluated from the perspective of study design and validity of conclusions.
Data synthesis: Eleven studies were reviewed. Five different light sources were used, each with varying parameters. Ten different clinical end point scales and methodologies were used. No 2 studies used the same clinical end point standards. The majority of the studies provided no statistical analysis of data.
Conclusions: The studies reviewed failed to present consistent data on the efficacy of nonablative photorejuvenation to improve or eliminate rhytids. The field is early in development, and continued improvement and standardization of study design are needed to determine the efficacy of these interventions.
Similar articles
-
Review of nonablative photorejuvenation: reversal of the aging effects of the sun and environmental damage using laser and light sources.Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003 Jun;22(2):93-106. doi: 10.1053/sder.2003.50008. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2003. PMID: 12877228 Review.
-
What is nonablative photorejuvenation of human skin?Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2002 Dec;21(4):238-50. doi: 10.1053/sder.2002.36764. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2002. PMID: 12512647 Review.
-
Visible light treatment of photoaging.Dermatol Ther. 2005 May-Jun;18(3):191-208. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.05019.x. Dermatol Ther. 2005. PMID: 16229721 Review.
-
Nonablative laser treatment of wrinkles: meeting the objective? Assessment by 25 dermatologists.Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):936-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05873.x. Br J Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15149506
-
Nonablative laser skin remodeling.Dermatol Clin. 2002 Jan;20(1):97-111, ix. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(03)00049-4. Dermatol Clin. 2002. PMID: 11859598 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy evaluation of endolift laser for treatment of nasolabial folds and marionette lines.Skin Res Technol. 2023 Oct;29(10):e13480. doi: 10.1111/srt.13480. Skin Res Technol. 2023. PMID: 37881043 Free PMC article.
-
Experience with non-ablative fractional photothermolysis with a dual-mode laser device (1,440/1,320 nm): no considerable clinical effect on hypertrophic/acne scars and facial wrinkles.Lasers Med Sci. 2011 Jul;26(4):473-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0893-2. Epub 2011 Feb 12. Lasers Med Sci. 2011. PMID: 21318344
-
[Laser treatment of wrinkles. Update].Hautarzt. 2007 Mar;58(3):210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00105-007-1291-3. Hautarzt. 2007. PMID: 17318466 Review. German.
-
A single-blinded randomised controlled study to determine the efficacy of Omnilux Revive facial treatment in skin rejuvenation.Lasers Med Sci. 2005;20(1):6-10. doi: 10.1007/s10103-005-0330-5. Epub 2005 May 21. Lasers Med Sci. 2005. PMID: 15909229 Clinical Trial.
-
[Lasers and aesthetic dermatology].Hautarzt. 2003 Jul;54(7):603-13. doi: 10.1007/s00105-003-0549-7. Epub 2003 Jun 12. Hautarzt. 2003. PMID: 12835862 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
