In re A.C
- PMID: 11648191
In re A.C
Abstract
KIE: In 1987, George Washington University Hospital petitioned the court for a declaration on how to treat A.C., who was close to death from cancer and was 26-1/2 weeks pregnant. The trial court ordered a cesarean section to deliver the viable fetus, despite A.C.'s express, though possibly incompetent, denial of consent. The child died within three hours, and A.C. died two days later. In this decision, the D.C. Court of Appeals holds that a common law and constitutional right assures the pregnant woman the right to refuse medical treatment for herself and the fetus. To protect her right, a court must determine the woman's wishes "by any means available." If the patient is incapable of giving informed consent, then her decision must be determined through substitute judgment, i.e., the court must determine what choice the mother would make if competent. Since the trial court instead balanced the state's interest against A.C.'s, its decision must be vacated.
Similar articles
-
Dissecting women, dissecting law: the court-ordering of caesarean section operations and the failure of informed consent to protect women of color.Natl Black Law J. 1994;13:211-37. Natl Black Law J. 1994. PMID: 11660478 No abstract available.
-
In re A.C.Atl Report. 1987 Nov 10;533:611-7. Atl Report. 1987. PMID: 11648174
-
The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1994;4(2):229-309. Albany Law J Sci Technol. 1994. PMID: 12091921 No abstract available.
-
Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 May;35(2):132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1995.tb01855.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995. PMID: 7677674 Review.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
Cited by
-
Teaching old dogs new tricks: the role of analogies in bioethical analysis and argumentation concerning new technologies.Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(5):397-413. doi: 10.1007/s11017-006-9018-5. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006. PMID: 17072558
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical