Warning! The Wildcard section includes information that might be considered spoilers for those not familiar with the story.
BASIC REPRESENTATION SCORE: +10
FEMALE AGENCY/POWER/AUTHORITY SCORE: +4
THE MALE GAZE SCORE: 0
[no issues]
GENDER/SEXUALITY SCORE: -5
WILDCARD SCORE: -10
Is there anything either positive or negative in the film’s representation of women not already accounted for here? (points will vary)
TOTAL SCORE: -1
IS THE FILM’S DIRECTOR FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
IS THE FILM’S SCREENWRITER FEMALE? No (does not impact scoring)
BOTTOM LINE: The existence of the 1982 original — which represents women better than this remake does — makes it easy to demonstrate how much movies have given themselves over to men’s journeys in recent decades, and how vitally important it has become for movies to ensure that boys and men get to grow as people even at the expense of girls and women doing the same.
Click here for the ongoing ranking of 2015’s films for female representation.
NOTE: This is not a “review” of Poltergeist! It is simply an examination of how well or how poorly it represents women. (A movie that represents women well can still be a terrible film; a movie that represents women poorly can still be a great film.) Read my review of Poltergeist.
See the full rating criteria. (Criteria that do not apply to this film have been deleted in this rating for maximum readability.)
This rating is brought to you without paywall restrictions by my generous Kickstarter supporters. If you missed out on the Kickstarter and would like to support this project, you may:
• become a monthly or yearly subscriber of FlickFilospher.com
• make a pledge at Patreon
• make a donation via Paypal
So not just pointless but pernicious. Great.