Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Mar 10;18(3):e61.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.5260.

Long-Term Condition Self-Management Support in Online Communities: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Papers

Affiliations
Review

Long-Term Condition Self-Management Support in Online Communities: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Papers

Chris Allen et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Recent years have seen an exponential increase in people with long-term conditions using the Internet for information and support. Prior research has examined support for long-term condition self-management through the provision of illness, everyday, and emotional work in the context of traditional offline communities. However, less is known about how communities hosted in digital spaces contribute through the creation of social ties and the mobilization of an online illness "workforce."

Objective: The aim was to understand the negotiation of long-term condition illness work in patient online communities and how such work may assist the self-management of long-term conditions in daily life.

Methods: A systematic search of qualitative papers was undertaken using various online databases for articles published since 2004. A total of 21 papers met the inclusion criteria of using qualitative methods and examined the use of peer-led online communities for those with a long-term condition. A qualitative meta-synthesis was undertaken and the review followed a line of argument synthesis.

Results: The main themes identified in relation to the negotiation of self-management support were (1) redressing offline experiential information and knowledge deficits, (2) the influence of modeling and learning behaviors from others on self-management, (3) engagement that validates illness and negates offline frustrations, (4) tie formation and community building, (5) narrative expression and cathartic release, and (6) dissociative anonymity and invisibility. These translated into a line of argument synthesis in which four network mechanisms for self-management support in patient online communities were identified. These were (1) collective knowledge and identification through lived experience; (2) support, information, and engagement through readily accessible gifting relationships; (3) sociability that extends beyond illness; and (4) online disinhibition as a facilitator in the negotiation of self-management support.

Conclusions: Social ties forged in online spaces provide the basis for performing relevant self-management work that can improve an individual's illness experience, tackling aspects of self-management that are particularly difficult to meet offline. Membership in online groups can provide those living with a long-term condition with ready access to a self-management support illness workforce and illness and emotional support. The substitutability of offline illness work may be particularly important to those whose access to support offline is either limited or absent. Furthermore, such resources require little negotiation online because information and support is seemingly gifted to the community by its members.

Keywords: chronic disease; illness work; long-term conditions; patient online communities; qualitative meta-synthesis; self-care; self-management; social media; social networks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of systematic search strategy, process and selection of research papers for review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of second- (blue) and third-order (gray) constructs in relation to the negotiation of self-management support in patient online communities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rogers A, Vassilev I, Sanders C, Kirk S, Chew-Graham C, Kennedy A, Protheroe J, Bower P, Blickem C, Reeves D, Kapadia D, Brooks H, Fullwood C, Richardson G. Social networks, work and network-based resources for the management of long-term conditions: a framework and study protocol for developing self-care support. Implement Sci. 2011;6:56. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-56. http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6//56 1748-5908-6-56 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Silva D. Helping People Help Themselves: A Review of the Evidence Considering Whether It Is Worthwhile to Support Self-Management. London: Health Foundation; 2011. May, [2015-10-13]. http://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/HelpingPeopleHelpThemselves... .
    1. Department of Health . Improving the Health and Well-Being of People with Long Term Conditions: World Class Services for People with Long Term Conditions –Information Tool for Commissioners. London: Department of Health; 2010. [2015-10-13]. http://www.yearofcare.co.uk/sites/default/files/pdfs/dh_improving%20the%... .
    1. Deperatment of Health. 2015. [2015-10-13]. Policy paper: 2010 to 2015 goverment policy: long term health conditions https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-polic... .
    1. Department of Health . Self-Care: A Real Choice. London: Department of Health; 2005. [2015-10-13]. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.g... .

Publication types