Although “older adults” typically refers to persons 60–65 years of age and older, gerontological researchers and policy makers increasingly recognize that this demarcation is socially constructed, and is linked to many sociocultural referents, including family status, lived experience, and health conditions that vary widely across generational cohorts and socioeconomic and cultural groups. These guidelines draw on research which flexibly employs various age cutoffs consistent with this nuanced approach. We use “older adults” in this document since it is commonly used by geropsychologists and is the recommended term in APA publications and inclusive language guide.
The specific goals of these professional practice guidelines are to provide practitioners with a frame of reference for engaging in professional work with older adults and basic information and further references in the areas of attitudes, general aspects of aging and broad impacts of intersectionality, clinical issues, assessment, intervention, consultation, professional issues, and continuing education and training relevant to practice.
The term “guidelines” refers to pronouncements, statements, or declarations that suggest or recommend specific professional competencies, behavior, endeavors, or conduct for psychologists. Guidelines differ from standards in that standards are mandatory and may be accompanied by an enforcement mechanism. Thus, guidelines are aspirational and are intended to facilitate the continued systematic development of the profession and to help ensure a high level of professional practice by psychologists.
The guidelines should not be construed as definitive and are not intended to take precedence over the professional judgment of psychologists. Guidelines essentially involve recommendations regarding professional conduct and issues to be considered in particular areas of psychological practice.
Need
Psychological science and practice in the area of geropsychology have evolved rapidly. Clinicians and researchers have made impressive strides toward identifying the unique aspects of knowledge that facilitate the accurate psychological assessment and effective treatment of older adults as the psychological literature in this area continues to burgeon.
Psychologists provide care to older adults in a wide range of settings from home and community-based clinics, to telehealth, integrated primary care, and long-term care settings. Nonetheless, older adults with mental disorders are less likely than younger and middle-aged adults to receive mental health services and, when they do, are less likely to receive care from a mental health specialist than younger persons.
The demand for psychologists with a substantial understanding of later life wellness, cultural, and clinical issues will expand as the older population grows and becomes more diverse, and as cohorts of younger individuals who are receptive to psychological services move into old age.
Compatibility
These guidelines build upon APA’s Ethics Code and are consistent with the Criteria for Practice Guideline Development and Evaluation and preexisting APA policy related to aging issues.
The guidelines are also consistent with the efforts that psychology has exerted over the past two decades to focus greater attention on the strengths and needs of older adults, and to develop workforce competency in working with older adults.
Development process
In 2021, the APA Policy and Planning Board, in accordance with Association Rule 30-8.4, provided notice that on December 31, 2023, the APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Older Adults would expire. The Board of Professional Affairs and the Committee on Professional Practice and Standards then conducted a review and recommended that the guidelines should not sunset, and that revision was appropriate.
Members of the Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Older Adults Revision Working Group considered the recent relevant background literature as well as the references contained in the initial guidelines for inclusion in the revision of the guidelines. They participated in formulating and/or reviewing all portions of the guidelines document and made suggestions about the inclusion of specific content and literature citations.
Reorganization of the guidelines was based upon consensus of workgroup members and informed by subject matter experts.