serum cholesterol, and different degrees of liver steato-
sis. Steatosis is reduced by decreased lipids and carbohy-
drates absorption and inhibited adipose tissue turn over
in both hepatic and adipose tissues. Antioxidant and anti-
inflammatory characteristics of the active agents result in
inhibited steatohepatitis (12).
Despite the findings of a few studies evaluating the
effect of green tea, there are controversies regarding the
effects of green tea extract on NAFLD. More studies are
needed to provide enough evidence on the probable effect
of green tea on preventing the development and/or pro-
In this study, the authors evaluated the effect of green
tea extract as a general antioxidant and iron chelating
agent on liver function, anthropometric measures, and
Iron markers in a randomized double blind controlled trial
on patients with NAFLD.
2. Methods
The study protocol of this double-blind randomized
controlled trial was approved by the ethical committee of
Iran University of Medical Sciences. The study was also reg-
istered on the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT), as
IRCT201404132365N8.
The researchers evaluated 108 known cases of NAFLD
for inclusion and exclusion criteria, from which 67 cases
entered the study. The inclusion criteria were confirmed
NAFLD diagnosis by a gastroenterologist with ultrasonog-
raphy, liver biopsy or liver Fibroscan, age of 18 or older, and
willingness to participate in the study. The exclusion crite-
ria were Iron deficiency anemia, allergy of green tea, his-
tory of alcohol consumption (more than 20 grams daily),
other liver disorders (viral hepatitis, auto immune hepati-
tis, celiac, Wilson, and Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency), preg-
nancy, and lactation. Participants were also supposed to be
excluded during the study if they showed allergy or other
side effects, became pregnant, and consumed less than 80%
of the supplements they received or did not wish to con-
tinue the study.
The participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups
based on a list already generated using a random number
sequence. Only the main researcher had access to this list
and could detect if a certain participant was receiving sup-
plements or placebo.
Patients in the intervention group received 550 mil-
ligrams of green tea tablets daily in divided doses, as well
as nutritional education and consultation for weight loss
with low calorie diet and life style change recommenda-
tion (minimum 2 to 3 sessions of 30 to 60 minutes of aer-
obic exercise weekly) for 3 months. The control group
received the same protocol with green tea replaced with
identical placebo capsules with starch composition.
Anthropometric evaluation, body composition, food
intake for energy, nutritional agents and Iron, liver en-
zymes, fasting blood sugar, insulin, hemoglobin, TIBC, fer-
ritin, transferrin, serum Iron, transferrin saturation, to-
tal antioxidant capacity, and malondialdehyde were eval-
uated at the beginning and end of the study. Biologic sam-
ple was acquired for mRNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
using reverse transcriptase.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version
19. Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), and percentage were
used for describing the data. Normality of the data was
evaluated by Shapiro-Wilk’s Test. T test and Mann-Whitney
U test were used for comparing the groups.
3. Results
After primary evaluation, 67 participants in the 2
groups (33 in the intervention and 34 in the control group)
were studied. Mean age of participants in the intervention
and control group was 41 and 39.5, respectively (P value of
0.61). There were 18 female participants in the intervention
and 22 in the control group. (P value of 0.85). In each group,
7 people had diabetes (P value: 0.73). There were no statis-
tical differences in other baseline characteristics (Table 1).
Each participant was followed for 3 months and fi-
nally 45 participants (21 in the intervention and 24 in the
placebo group) completed the follow-up. Two of the con-
trol group and 3 of the intervention group participants dis-
continued due to assumed side effects. The reasons for dis-
continuation were immigration, other medical problems,
side effects, and losing their interest in the study. Details
are presented in the participant’s flow diagram (Figure 1).