The retromolar space: a morphological curiosity observed amongst the protohistoric Arikara and Mandan

C De la Cova�- International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
C De la Cova
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2016Wiley Online Library
The retromolar space (RMS), defined in palaeoanthropology as a space posterior to the third
molar, between the distal edge of the tooth and the anterior margin of the ascending ramus
when the mandible is held in lateral view, has been described as an autapomorphic trait
unique to Neanderthals despite its presence in anatomically modern humans. This study
examined RMS prevalence in a sample of protohistoric Arikara and Mandan Amerindians to
determine what craniofacial morphology is correlated with the RMS. It was hypothesised that�…
Abstract
The retromolar space (RMS), defined in palaeoanthropology as a space posterior to the third molar, between the distal edge of the tooth and the anterior margin of the ascending ramus when the mandible is held in lateral view, has been described as an autapomorphic trait unique to Neanderthals despite its presence in anatomically modern humans. This study examined RMS prevalence in a sample of protohistoric Arikara and Mandan Amerindians to determine what craniofacial morphology is correlated with the RMS. It was hypothesised that the feature would be present in the Amerindians studied and associated with a long cranial length, a large nasal height, midfacial prognathism, a broad mandible, and dental wear. The results indicated that RMSs were present in the Arikara and Mandan and significantly correlated with cranial length, cranial breadth, nasal height, bizygomatic breadth, basion‐nasion length, basion‐nasiospinale, mandible length, gonial angle, bigonial breadth, and dental wear. Thus, RMSs are associated with a dolichocephalic skull, wide cranial and facial breadth, a prognathic face, large nose and a corresponding wide and long mandible with a reduced gonial angle. This suggests that the RMS is the result of these features merging together in the craniofacial complex and should not be considered a Neanderthal autapomorphy. Copyright � 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wiley Online Library
Showing the best result for this search. See all results