Abstract
There is controversy over whether stream segregation is an attention-dependent process. Part of the argument is related to the initial formation of auditory streams. It has been suggested that attention is needed only to form the streams, but not to maintain them once they have been segregated. The question of whether covert attention at the beginning of a to-be-ignored set of sounds will be enough to initiate the segregation process remains open. Here, we investigate this question by (1) using a methodology that does not require the participant to make an overt response to assess how the unattended sounds are organized and (2) structuring the test sound sequence to account for the covert attention explanation. The results of four experiments provide evidence to support the view that attention is not always required for the formation of auditory streams.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alain, C., &Woods, D. L. (1997). Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials.Psychophysiology,34, 534–546.
Bee, M. A., &Klump, G. M. (2004). Primitive auditory stream segregation: A neurophysiological study in the songbird forebrain.Journal of Neurophysiology,92, 1088–1104.
Botte, M.-C., Drake, C., Brochard, R., &McAdams, S. (1997). Perceptual attenuation of nonfocused auditory streams.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 419–425.
Bregman, A. S. (1978). Auditory streaming is cumulative.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 380–387.
Bregman, A. S. (1990).Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brochard, R., Drake, C., Botte, M.-C., &McAdams, S. (1999). Perceptual organization of complex auditory sequences: Effect of number of simultaneous subsequences and frequency separation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1742–1759.
Carlyon, R. P. (2004). How the brain separates sounds.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 465–471.
Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., &Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 115–127.
Cowan, N., Winkler, I., Teder, W., &Näätänen, R. (1993). Memory prerequisites of mismatch negativity in the auditory event-related potential (ERP).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 909–921.
Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., &Carlyon, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,30, 643–656.
Duncan, J., Martens, S., &Ward, R. (1997). Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.Nature,387, 808–810.
Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., &Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials.Audiology & Neuro-Otology,5, 151–166.
Fay, R. R. (2000). Spectral contrasts underlying auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus).Journal of Associative Research in Otolaryngology,1, 120–128.
Fishman, Y. I., Reser, D. H., Arezzo, J. C., &Steinschneider, M. (2001). Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey.Hearing Research,151, 167–187.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., &Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,25, 355–373.
Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J., &Bouchet, P. (1990). Brain generators implicated in processing of auditory stimulus deviance: A topographic event-related potential study.Psychophysiology,27, 627–640.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., &Picton, T. W. (1973). Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.Science,182, 177–180.
Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K., &Luck, S. J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Elec-trophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,353, 1257–1270.
Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Sussman, E. [S.], &Winkler, I. (2001). Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain.Cognitive Brain Research,12, 131–144.
Hulse, S. H., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., &Wisniewski, A. B. (1997). Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: Stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).Journal of Comparative Psychology,111, 3–13.
Izumi, A. (2002). Auditory stream segregation in Japanese monkeys.Cognition,82, B113-B122.
Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S., &Macken, B. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 464–473.
Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Macken, W. J., Banbury, S. P., &Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: Linear effects of changing-state in the irrelevant sequence.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,108, 1082–1088.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review,83, 323–355.
Kanwal, J. S., Medvedev, A. V., &Micheyl, C. (2003). Neurodynamics for auditory stream segregation: Tracking sounds in the mustached bat’s natural environment.Network,14, 413–435.
Knight, R. T., &Scabini, D. (1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans.Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology,15, 3–13.
Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 75–82.
Loveless, N. E. (1986). Potentials evoked by temporal deviance.Biological Psychology,22, 149–167.
Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J., Nicholls, A. P., &Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 43–51.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (2005).Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Micheyl, C., Tian, B., Carlyon, R. P., &Rauschecker, J. P. (2005). Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques.Neuron,48, 139–148.
Moore, B. C. J., &Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation.Acta Acustica united with Acustica,88, 320–333.
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H., Jiang, D., &Alho, K. (1993). Attention and mismatch negativity.Psychophysiology,30, 436–450.
Näätänen, R., Simpson, R., &Loveless, N. E. (1982). Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials.Biological Psychology,14, 53–98.
Näätänen, R., Tervaniemi, M., Sussman, E., Paavilainen, P., &Winkler, I. (2001). Pre-attentive cognitive processing (“primitive intelligence”) in the auditory cortex as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN).Trends in Neurosciences,24, 283–288.
Näätänen, R., &Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience.Psychological Bulletin,125, 826–859.
Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., &Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river.Audiology & Neuro-Otology,5, 111–139.
Ritter, W., Sussman, E., &Molholm, S. (2000). Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects.Neuro-Report,11, 61–63.
Scherg, M., Vajsar, J., &Picton, T. W. (1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 336–355.
Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model.Psychophysiology,34, 245–257.
Schul, J., &Sheridan, R. A. (2006). Auditory stream segregation in an insect.Neuroscience,138, 1–4.
Snyder, J. S., Alain, C., &Picton, T. W. (2006). Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 1–13.
Sussman, E. S., Bregman, A. S., Wang, W. J., &Kahn, F. J. (2005). Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds in multistream auditory environments.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,5, 93–110.
Sussman, E. [S.], Čeponienė, R., Shestakova, A., Näätänen, R., &Winkler, I. (2001). Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children and adults.Hearing Research,153, 108–114.
Sussman, E. [S.], Ritter, W., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998a). Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system.Brain Research,789, 130–138.
Sussman, E. [S.], Ritter, W., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1998b). Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity.NeuroReport,9, 4167–4170.
Sussman, E. [S.], Ritter, W., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1999). An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials.Psychophysiology,36, 22–34.
Sussman, E. [S.], Winkler, I., Huotilainen, M., Ritter, W., &Näätänen, R. (2002). Top-down effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization.Cognitive Brain Research,13, 393–405.
Sussman, E. [S.], Winkler, I., &Wang, W. (2003). MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection.Psychophysiology,40, 430–435.
Trejo, L. J., Ryan-Jones, D. L., &Kramer, A. F. (1995). Attentional modulation of the mismatch negativity elicited by frequency differences between binaurally presented tone bursts.Psychophysiology,32, 319–328.
Tremblay, S., &Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 659–671.
Van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1975).Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Sussman, E. [S.], Horváth, J., &Balázs, L. (2005). Preattentive binding of auditory and visual stimulus features.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,17, 320–339.
Winkler, I., Horváth, J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., Näätänen, R., &Sussman, E. (2003). Neural model of sound sources in auditory cortex.NeuroReport,14, 2053–2056.
Winkler, I., Karmos, G., &Näätänen, R. (1996). Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential.Brain Research,742, 239–252.
Winkler, I., Kushnerenko, E., Horváth, J., Čeponienė, R., Fellman, V., Huotilainen, M., et al. (2003). Newborn infants can organize the auditory world.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,100, 11812–11815.
Winkler, I., Sussman, E., Tervaniemi, M., Horváth, J., Ritter, W., &Näätänen, R. (2003). Preattentive auditory context effects.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,3, 57–77.
Woldorff, M. G., &Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,79, 170–191.
Woldorff, M. G., Hillyard, S. A., Gallen, C. C., Hampson, S. R., &Bloom, F. E. (1998). Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex.Psychophysiology,35, 283–292.
Yabe, H., Winkler, I., Czigler, I., Koyama, S., Kakigi, R., Sutoh, T., et al. (2001). Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: The interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration.Brain Research,897, 222–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 DC004263) and the Hungarian Science Research Fund (OTKA T034112).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sussman, E.S., Horváth, J., Winkler, I. et al. The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 136–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194460
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194460