skip to main content
10.1145/3218585.3218674acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing usability of a Citizen Observatory based on User-centered Design

Published: 20 June 2018 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Several crowdsourcing-based systems have been employed to gather information from individuals in natural disaster domain. They involve a wide diversity of users, which make their usability an important aspect. This article deals with the understanding of users' needs and design of a new interface for the Citizen Observatory of Floods. An User-centered Design (UCD) approach was employed and users were the main focus of the development process. The outcomes of a heuristic evaluation conducted revealed several problems of the prototype regarding usability aspects.

    References

    [1]
    Ed H. Chi. 2013. The False Dichotomy Between Accessibility and Usability. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19:1--19:2.
    [2]
    Alan Chuter and Yeliz Yesilada. 2009. Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBP) and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). World Wide Web Consortium, Note NOTE-mwbp-wcag-20090709 (2009).
    [3]
    Adam Connors and Bryan Sullivan. 2010. Mobile web application best practices. Online} Avaliable: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-mwabp-20101214 (2010).
    [4]
    Lívia Castro Degrossi, Jo ao Porto de Albuquerque, Maria Clara Fava, and Eduardo Mario Mendiondo. 2014. Flood Citizen Observatory: a crowdsourcing-based approach for flood risk management in Brazil. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering. Vancouver, Canada, 570--575.
    [5]
    Susan Farrell. 2016. Open-Ended vs. Closed-Ended Questions in User Research. Online. (2016). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/open-ended-questions/ Accessed: May 10th, 2018.
    [6]
    Michael F. Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4(2007), 211--221.
    [7]
    Flávio E.A. Horita, Jo ao Porto de Albuquerque, Lívia Castro Degrossi, Eduardo M. Mendiondo, and Jó Ueyama. 2015. Development of a spatial decision support system for flood risk management in Brazil that combines volunteered geographic information with wireless sensor networks. Computers & Geosciences 80 (2015), 84--94.
    [8]
    International Standards Organization (ISO). 2010. Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210). European Committee for Standardization, Switzerland.
    [9]
    Cecilia Katzeff, Asa Nyblom, Sara Tunheden, and Carin Torstensson. 2012. User-centred design and evaluation of Energy Coach: an interactive energy service for households. Behaviour & Information Technology 31, 3 (2012), 305--324.
    [10]
    Bertrand De Longueville, Robin S. Smith, and Gianluca Luraschi. 2009. "OMG, from Here, I Can See the Flames!": A Use Case of Mining Location Based Social Networks to Acquire Spatio-temporal Data on Forest Fires. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks. 73--80.
    [11]
    Kevin McDougall. 2011. Using Volunteered Information to Map the Queensland Floods. In Proceedings of the Surveying & Spatial Sciences Biennial Conference. Wellington, New Zealand, 13--24.
    [12]
    Ranieri Brito Moreira, Livia Castro Degrossi, and Jo ao Porto de Albuquerque. 2015. An experimental evaluation of a crowdsourcing-based approach for flood risk management. In Proceedings of 12th Workshop on Experimental Software Engineering. Lima, Peru, 393--403.
    [13]
    Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Heuristic evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, 25--62.
    [14]
    Jennifer Preece, Yvonne Rogers, and Helen Sharp. 2002. Interaction Design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
    [15]
    André Lima Salgado and André Pimenta Freire. 2014. Heuristic Evaluation of Mobile Usability: A Mapping Study. Springer, Cham, 178--188.
    [16]
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 2018. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. Online. (2018). https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/Overview.html#contents Accessed: May 3rd, 2018.
    [17]
    David J. Wald, Vincent Quitoriano, Bruce Worden, Margaret Hopper, and James W. Dewey. 2011. USGS "Did You Feel It?" Internet-based macroseismic intensity maps. Annals of Geophysics 54, 6 (2011), 688--707.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Physical- and Social-Based Rain Gauges—A Case Study on Urban Flood DetectionGeosciences10.3390/geosciences1304011113:4(111)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Adoption of Responsible Research and Innovation in Citizen ObservatoriesSustainability10.3390/su1412737914:12(7379)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022

    Index Terms

    1. Enhancing usability of a Citizen Observatory based on User-centered Design

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DSAI '18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
      June 2018
      365 pages
      ISBN:9781450364676
      DOI:10.1145/3218585
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 20 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Citizen Observatory
      2. Human-computer interaction
      3. Usability
      4. User-centered Design

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      DSAI 2018

      Acceptance Rates

      DSAI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 23 submissions, 74%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 23 submissions, 74%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Physical- and Social-Based Rain Gauges—A Case Study on Urban Flood DetectionGeosciences10.3390/geosciences1304011113:4(111)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2023
      • (2022)Adoption of Responsible Research and Innovation in Citizen ObservatoriesSustainability10.3390/su1412737914:12(7379)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2022

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media