demonstration

Free access

HARMLESS: Cost-Effective Transitioning to SDN

Authors:

Gábor Rétvári,

Gergely Pongrácz,

Levente Csikor, and

Dimitrios P. PezarosAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCOMM Posters and Demos '17: Proceedings of the SIGCOMM Posters and Demos

August 2017

Pages 91 - 93

https://doi.org/10.1145/3123878.3131997

Published: 22 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Recently, Software-Defined Networking has grown out of being an "intriguing approach" and turned into a "must-have" for communication networks to overcome many long-standing problems of traditional networking. However, there are still some obstacles on the way to the widespread adoption. Current commodity-off-the-shelf (COTS) SDN offerings are still in their infancy and are notorious for lacking standards compliance, scalability, and unpredictable performance indicators compared to their legacy counterparts. On the other hand, recent software-based solutions might mitigate these shortcomings, but in terms of cost-efficiency and port density they are in a lower league.

Here, we present HARMLESS, a novel SDN switch design that combines the rapid innovation and upgrade cycles of software switches with the port density of hardware-based appliances into a fully data plane-transparent, vendor-neutral and cost-effective solution for smaller enterprises to gain a foothold in this era. The demo showcases the SDN migration of a dumb legacy Ethernet switch to a powerful, fully reconfigurable, OpenFlow-enabled network device without incurring any major performance and latency penalty, nor any substantial price tag enabling to realize many use cases that would have otherwise needed standalone hardware appliances.

References

[1]

K. Argyraki, S. Baset, B.-G. Chun, K. Fall, G. Iannaccone, A. Knies, E. Kohler, M. Manesh, S. Nedevschi, and S. Ratnasamy. Can software routers scale? In PRESTO, pages 21--26, 2008.

Digital Library

[2]

M. Casado, T. Koponen, D. Moon, and S. Shenker. Rethinking packet forwarding hardware. In HotNets, pages 1--6, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.

[3]

L. Csikor, M. Szalay, B. Sonkoly, and L. Toka. NFPA: Network function performance analyzer. In IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks Demo Track (NFV-SDN), pages 17--19, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015, http://nfpa.tmit.bme.hu.

[4]

G. Ferro. Soft switching fails at scale. EtherealMind, 2011.

[5]

J. Gross, A. Lambeth, B. Pfaff, and M. Casado. The rise of soft switching, Part I, II, III. Network Heresy, 2011.

[6]

S.Jain et al. B4: Experience with a globally-deployed software defined wan. In SIGCOMM, pages 3--14, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[7]

D. Levin, M. Canini, S. Schmid, F. Schaffert, and A. Feldmann. Panopticon: Reaping the benefits of incremental SDN deployment in enterprise networks. In USENIX ATC, pages 333--345, 2014.

Digital Library

[8]

M. McNickle. With hybrid SDN deployment, no need for network forklift. TechTarget SearchSDN, 2013.

[9]

L. Molnár, G. Pongrácz, G. Enyedi, Z. L. Kis, L. Csikor, F. Juhász, A. Kőrösi, and G. Rétvári. Dataplane specialization for high-performance openflow software switching. In SIGCOMM, pages 539--552, Florianopólis, 2016. ACM.

Digital Library

[10]

D. Moon, J. Naous, J. Liu, K. Zarifis, M. Casado, T. Koponen, S. Shenker, and L. Breslau. Bridging the software/hardware forwarding divide. UC Berkeley.

[11]

B. S. Networks. Migrating from a Traditional Network to a Software-Deined Network. https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/featured/big-switch-state-of-sdn-adoption/2016/09/, Sept 2016.

[12]

Open Networking Foundation. SDN Migration Considerations and Use Cases. ONF Solution Brief, 2014.

[13]

I. Pepelnjak. Q&A: Vendor Openflow Limitations. http://blog.ipspace.net/2016/12/q-vendor-openflow-limitations.html, Dec 2016.

[14]

G. Pongrácz, L. Molnár, Z. L. Kis, and Z. Turányi. Cheap silicon: A myth or reality? picking the right data plane hardware for software defined networking. In HotSDN, pages 103--108, 2013.

Digital Library

[15]

S. Vissicchio, O. Tilmans, L. Vanbever, and J. Rexford. Central control over distributed routing. In SIGCOMM, pages 43--56, 2015.

Digital Library

[16]

Zeus Kerravala. The top five reasons to deploy software-defined networks and network functions virtualization. Report: https://goo.gl/KeTEcd, May 2014.

Cited By

Akarte HYadav D(2023)Packet processing and data plane program verification: A survey with tools, techniques, and challengesInternational Journal of Communication Systems10.1002/dac.555436:14Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5554
Csikor LSzalay MRétvári GPongrácz GPezaros DToka L(2020)Transition to SDN is HARMLESS: Hybrid Architecture for Migrating Legacy Ethernet Switches to SDNIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2019.295876228:1(275-288)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TNET.2019.2958762
Huang XCheng SCao KCong PWei THu S(2019)A Survey of Deployment Solutions and Optimization Strategies for Hybrid SDN NetworksIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.287106121:2(1483-1507)Online publication date: Oct-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2871061
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

HARMLESS: Cost-Effective Transitioning to SDN
1. Networks
  1. Network architectures
    1. Network design principles
      1. Layering
  2. Network components
    1. Intermediate nodes
      1. Bridges and switches
      2. Routers

Recommendations

Live migration of an entire network (and its hosts)
HotNets-XI: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks

Live virtual machine (VM) migration can move applications from one location to another without a disruption in service. However, applications often consist of multiple VMs and rely on the state of the underlying network for basic reachability, access ...
Read More
A low-latency modular switch for CMP systems

As technology advances, the number of cores in Chip MultiProcessor systems and MultiProcessor Systems-on-Chips keeps increasing. The network must provide sustained throughput and ultra-low latencies. In this paper we propose new pipelined switch designs ...
Read More
Improving multistage network performance under uniform and hot-spot traffics
SPDP '90: Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Second Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing

The major performance drawbacks of multistage interconnection networks are due to link contention and message blockage. To remedy this problem, the authors propose a switch design which uses two independent routes between each input port and each output ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCOMM Posters and Demos '17: Proceedings of the SIGCOMM Posters and Demos

August 2017

158 pages

ISBN:9781450350570

DOI:10.1145/3123878

Co-chairs:
Jeff Burke
UCLA
,
Matthias Wählisch
Freie Universität Berlin
,
Nicholas Zhang
Huawei Technologies, China
,
David Meyer
University of Oregon/Brocade
,
Puneet Sharma
Hewlett Packard Labs

Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 August 2017

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Demonstration
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

SIGCOMM '17

Sponsor:

SIGCOMM

SIGCOMM '17: ACM SIGCOMM 2017 Conference

August 22 - 24, 2017

CA, Los Angeles, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
288
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)31
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Akarte HYadav D(2023)Packet processing and data plane program verification: A survey with tools, techniques, and challengesInternational Journal of Communication Systems10.1002/dac.555436:14Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.5554
Csikor LSzalay MRétvári GPongrácz GPezaros DToka L(2020)Transition to SDN is HARMLESS: Hybrid Architecture for Migrating Legacy Ethernet Switches to SDNIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2019.295876228:1(275-288)Online publication date: 14-Feb-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TNET.2019.2958762
Huang XCheng SCao KCong PWei THu S(2019)A Survey of Deployment Solutions and Optimization Strategies for Hybrid SDN NetworksIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials10.1109/COMST.2018.287106121:2(1483-1507)Online publication date: Oct-2020
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2871061
Csikor LToka LSzalay MPongracz GPezaros DRetvari G(2018)HARMLESS: Cost-Effective Transitioning to SDN for Small Enterprises2018 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2018.8696504(1-9)Online publication date: May-2018
https://doi.org/10.23919/IFIPNetworking.2018.8696504

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents