Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Integrative Biology

Dietary fat and total energy intake modifies the association of genetic profile risk score on obesity: evidence from 48 170 UK Biobank participants

Abstract

Background:

Obesity is a multifactorial condition influenced by both genetics and lifestyle. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the association between a validated genetic profile risk score for obesity (GPRS-obesity) and body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) was modified by macronutrient intake in a large general population study.

Methods:

This study included cross-sectional data from 48 170 white European adults, aged 37–73 years, participating in the UK Biobank. Interactions between GPRS-obesity and macronutrient intake (including total energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate and dietary fibre intake) and its effects on BMI and WC were investigated.

Results:

The 93-single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) GPRS was associated with a higher BMI (β: 0.57 kg m2 per s.d. increase in GPRS (95% confidence interval: 0.53–0.60); P=1.9 × 10−183) independent of major confounding factors. There was a significant interaction between GPRS and total fat intake (P(interaction)=0.007). Among high-fat-intake individuals, BMI was higher by 0.60 (0.52, 0.67) kg m−2 per s.d. increase in GPRS-obesity; the change in BMI with GPRS was lower among low-fat-intake individuals (β: 0.50 (0.44, 0.57) kg m−2). Significant interactions with similar patterns were observed for saturated fat intake (high β: 0.66 (0.59, 0.73) versus low β: 0.49 (0.42, 0.55) kg m−2, P(interaction)=2 × 10−4) and for total energy intake (high β: 0.58 (0.51, 0.64) versus low β: 0.49 (0.42, 0.56) kg m−2, P(interaction)=0.019), but not for protein intake, carbohydrate intake and fibre intake (P(interaction) >0.05). The findings were broadly similar using WC as the outcome.

Conclusions:

These data suggest that the benefits of reducing the intake of fats and total energy intake may be more important in individuals with high genetic risk for obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hill JO . Understanding and addressing the epidemic of obesity: an energy balance perspective. Endocr Rev 2006; 27: 750–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchard C . Gene-environment interactions in the etiology of obesity: defining the fundamentals. Obesity 2008; 16: S5–S10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eichler EE, Flint J, Gibson G, Kong A, Leal SM, Moore JH et al. Missing heritability and strategies for finding the underlying causes of complex disease. Nat Rev Genet 2010; 11: 446–450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 2009; 461: 747–753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Després JP, Nadeau A, Lupien PJ, Theriault G et al. The response to long-term overfeeding in identical-twins. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1477–1482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maes HHM, Neale MC, Eaves LJ . Genetic and environmental factors in relative body weight and human adiposity. Behav Genet 1997; 27: 325–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mutch DM, Clément K . Unraveling the genetics of human obesity. PLoS Genet 2006; 2: 1956–1963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parnell LD, Blokker BA, Dashti HS, Nesbeth PD, Cooper BE, Ma Y et al. CardioGxE, a catalog of gene-environment interactions for cardiometabolic traits. BioData Min 2014; 7: 21.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Perusse L, Bouchard C . Genotype-environment interaction in human obesity. Nutr Rev 1999; 57: S31–S37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perusse L, Bouchard C . Gene-diet interactions in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 1285S–1290S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Lara J, Ashor AW, Lovegrove JA, Martinez JA et al. Associations between FTO genotype and total energy and macronutrient intake in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2015; 16: 666–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE, Pers TH, Day FR et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015; 518: 197–U401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rukh G, Sonestedt E, Melander O, Hedblad B, Wirfalt E, Ericson U et al. Genetic susceptibility to obesity and diet intakes: association and interaction analyses in the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Genes Nutr 2013; 8: 535–547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Qi Q, Chu AY, Kang JH, Jensen MK, Curhan GC, Pasquale LR et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and genetic risk of obesity. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1387–1396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Qi Q, Chu AY, Kang JH, Huang J, Rose LM, Jensen MK et al. Fried food consumption, genetic risk, and body mass index: gene-diet interaction analysis in three US cohort studies. Br Med J 2014; 348: g1610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins R . What makes UK Biobank special? Lancet 2012; 379: 1173–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmer LJ. UK . Biobank: bank on it. Lancet 2007; 369: 1980–1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galante J, Adamska L, Young A, Young H, Littlejohns TJ, Gallacher J et al. The acceptability of repeat Internet-based hybrid diet assessment of previous 24-h dietary intake: administration of the Oxford WebQ in UK Biobank. Br J Nutr 2015; 115: 681–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCance R . McCance and Widdowson’s the Composition of Foods, 7 edn, vol 7. Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Celis-Morales C, Lyall DM, Anderson J, Pell JP, Sattar N, Gill J . The association between physical activity and risk of mortality is modulated by grip strength and cardiorespiratory fitness: evidence from 498,135 UK-Biobank participants. Eur Heart J 2016; 38: 116–122.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. IPAQ. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) - Short Form, Version 2.0. In. Version 2 ed: IPAQ 2004. Available at: http://www.institutferran.org/documentos/scoring_short_ipaq_april04.pdf.

  22. WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation: Geneva, 2000. Report no. 0512-3054.

  23. Townsend P, Phillimore M, Beattie A . Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North. Croom Helm Ltd: London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81: 559–575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Qi Q, Li Y, Chomistek AK, Kang JH, Curhan GC, Pasquale LR et al. Television watching, leisure time physical activity, and the genetic predisposition in relation to body mass index in women and men. Circulation 2012; 126: 1821–U70.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Anderson JJ, Celis-Morales CA, Mackay DF, Iliodromiti S, Lyall DM, Sattar N et al. Adiposity among 132 479 UK Biobank participants; contribution of sugar intake vs other macronutrients. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 492–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bray GA, Popkin BM . Dietary fat intake does affect obesity!. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 1157–1173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hooper L, Abdelhamid A, Moore HJ, Douthwaite W, Skeaff CM, Summerbell CD . Effect of reducing total fat intake on body weight: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. Br Med J 2012; 345: e7666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J et al. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet 2009; 373: 1083–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collaboration NRF. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1377–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tyrrell J, Wood AR, Ames RM, Yaghootkar H, Beaumont RN, Jones SE . Gene–obesogenic environment interactions in the UK Biobank study. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 559–575.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Celis-Morales C, Lyall DM, Guo Y, Steell L, Llanas D, Ward J et al. Sleep characteristics modify the association of genetic predisposition with obesity and anthropometric measurements in 119,679 UK Biobank participants. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 105: 980–990.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Celis-Morales CA, Marsaux CFM, Livingstone KM, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, O'Donovan CB et al. Physical activity attenuates the effect of the FTO genotype on obesity traits in European adults: the Food4Me study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2016; 24: 962–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Celis-Morales CL, J. Mathers JC . Personalising nutritional guidance for more effective behaviour change. Proc Nutr Soc 2014; 0: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CFM, Macready AL, Fallaize R, O’Donovan CB et al. Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4me European randomized controlled trial. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 578–588.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Papandonatos GD, Erar B, Florez JC, Jablonski KA et al. FTO genotype and weight loss: systematic review and meta-analysis of 9563 individual participant data from eight randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2016; 354: i4707.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource (application 7155). We are grateful to UK Biobank participants. The UK Biobank was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, Department of Health, Scottish Government and the Northwest Regional Development Agency. It has also had funding from the Welsh Assembly Government and the British Heart Foundation. The research was designed, conducted, analysed and interpreted by the authors entirely independently of the funding sources.

Author contributions

CAC-M, JPP, JMRG and NS contributed to the conception and design of the study, advised on all statistical aspects and interpreted the data. CAC-M, DML, YG and FP performed the statistical analysis. CAC-M, JPP, JMRG and NS drafted the manuscript. CAC-M, DML, PW, JA, SI, SRG, YG, LS, FP, DFM, MESB, JPP, JMRG and NS reviewed the manuscript and approved the final version to be published. CAC-M, DML, JPP, JMRG and NS had full access to all the data in the study and took responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Sattar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celis-Morales, C., Lyall, D., Gray, S. et al. Dietary fat and total energy intake modifies the association of genetic profile risk score on obesity: evidence from 48 170 UK Biobank participants. Int J Obes 41, 1761–1768 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.169

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2017.169

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links