Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond the Binary: Rethinking the Social Model of Disabled Sexuality

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the social model of disabled sexuality offers a fundamental and vitally important critique of ableist assumptions concerning disabled people’s sexuality, it remains limited. This article offers a brief history and critical overview of the most recent scholarship emerging out of the social model of disabled sexuality; argues that the new scholarship, which is meant largely to challenge dominant ableist assumptions concerning disabled people’s sexuality, actually serves to reinforce the heterosexual matrix; and provides both theoretical and practical means of transforming the future landscape of (dis/abled) human sexualities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shakespeare, T.: The sexual politics of disabled masculinity. Sex. Disabil. 17(1), 53–64 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shakespeare, T., Gillespie-Sells, K., Davies, D.: The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires, p. 60. Cassell, London and New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, J.: Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taleporos, G., McCabe, M.P.: Physical disability and sexual esteem. Sex. Disabil. 19(2), 131–148 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McRuer, R.: We were never identified: feminism, queer theory, and a disabled world. Radic. Hist. Rev. 94, 148–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, L.J.: The end of identity politics and the beginning of dismodernism. In: Davis, L.J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd edn, pp. 231–242. Routledge, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tremain, S.: Queering disabled sexuality studies. Sex. Disabil. 18(4), 291–299 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shakespeare, T.: The social model of disability. In: Davis, L.J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd edn, pp. 197–204. Routledge, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shakespeare, T.: Disabled sexuality: toward rights and recognition. Sex. Disabil. 18(3), 159–166 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fine, M., Asch, A.: Disability beyond stigma: social interaction, discrimination and activism. J. Soc. Issues 44(1), 3–22 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fine, M., Asch, A.: Disabled women: sexism without the pedestal. J. Sociol. Soc. Welf. 6, 233–248 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finger, A.: Forbidden fruit. New Int. 233, 8–10 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garland-Thomson, R.: Extraordinary Bodies. Columbia University Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hahn, H.: “Can disability be beautiful?” Soc. Policy 26–32 (Winter 1988)

  15. Hahn, H.: The politics of physical differences: disability and discrimination. J. Soc. Issues 44, 39–47 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hahn, H.: The social component of sexuality, disability: some problems and proposals. Sex. Disabil. 4(4), 220–233 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prilleltensky, O.: Motherhood and Disability: Children and Choices, p. 45. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiduccia, B.W.: Current issues in sexuality and the disability movement. Sex. Disabil. 18(3), 167–174 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Milligan, M.S., Neufeldt, A.H.: The myth of asexuality: a survey of social and empirical evidence. Sex. Disabil. 19(2), 91–109 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howland, C.A., Rintala, D.H.: Dating behaviors of women with physical disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 19(1), 41–70 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karellou, J.: Laypeople’s attitudes towards the sexuality of people with learning disabilities in Greece. Sex. Disabil. 21, 64–84 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kef, S., Bos, H.: Is love blind? Sexual behavior and psychological adjustment of adolescents with blindness. Sex. Disabil. 24, 89–100 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Toole, C.J.: The view from below: developing a knowledge base about an unknown population. Sex. Disabil. 18(3), 207–224 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prilleltensky, O.: A ramp to motherhood: the experiences of mothers with physical disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 21(1), 21–47 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards, E., Tepper, M., Whipple, B., Komisaruk, B.R.: Women with complete spinal cord injury: a phenomenological study of sexuality and relationship experiences. Sex. Disabil. 15(4), 271–283 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rintala, D.H., Howland, C.A., Nosek, M.A., Bennett, J.L., Young, M.E., Foley, C.C., Donald Rossi, C., Chanpong, G.: Dating issues for women with physical disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 15(4), 219–242 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Whitney, C.: Intersections in identity-identity development among queer women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 24, 39–52 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guldin, A.: Self-claiming sexuality: mobility impaired people and American culture. Sex. Disabil. 18(4), 233–238 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Potgeiter, C.-A., Khan, G.: Sexual self-esteem and body image of South African spinal cord injured adolescents. Sex. Disabil. 23(1), 1–20 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karlen, A.: Positive sexual effects of chronic illness: case studies of women with lupus (SLE). Sex. Disabil. 20(3), 191–208 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sakellariou, D.: If not the disability, then what? Barriers to reclaiming sexuality following spinal chord injury. Sex. Disabil. 24, 101–111 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Barron, K.: The bumpy road to womanhood. Disabil. Soc. 12(2), 223–240 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Buzzanell, P.M.: A feminist standpoint analysis of maternity and maternity leave for women with disabilities. Women Lang. 26(2), 53–65 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tremain, S.: On the government of disability: foucault, power, and the subject of impairment. In: Davis, L.J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd edn, pp. 185–196. Routledge, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hughes, B.: What can a foucauldian analysis contribute to disability theory? In: Tremain, S. (ed.) Foucault and the Government of Disability, pp. 78–92. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Allen, J.S.: Unpublished paper presented at the international congress on women’s mental health in Melbourne. 20 March 2008 (forthcoming in the British Medical Journal)

  37. Mosher, W., Chandra, A., Jones, J.: “Sexual behavior and selected health measures: men and women 15–44 years of age, United States, 2002.” Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics. 362 (September 15, 2005). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Center for Health Statistics. 1–56

  38. Emens, E.F.: Monogamy’s law: compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. NY. Univ. Rev. Law Soc. Change 29, 277–376 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Coontz, S.: The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap. Basic Books, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History and Disability Studies Initiative, University of Arizona, 215 Social Science Bldg., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA

    Michael A. Rembis

Authors
  1. Michael A. Rembis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Rembis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rembis, M.A. Beyond the Binary: Rethinking the Social Model of Disabled Sexuality. Sex Disabil 28, 51–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9133-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9133-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation